<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1692 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285353</link>
    <description>The tribunal rejected the applicant&#039;s request for the release of an interim payment, citing incomplete valuation report and lapsed offer under Section 236 of the Companies Act, 2013. The tribunal highlighted the importance of resolving pending applications before any disbursement could occur.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2020 09:35:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1692 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285353</link>
      <description>The tribunal rejected the applicant&#039;s request for the release of an interim payment, citing incomplete valuation report and lapsed offer under Section 236 of the Companies Act, 2013. The tribunal highlighted the importance of resolving pending applications before any disbursement could occur.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>