<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1806 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285361</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the reassessment notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, finding that the reasons recorded for reopening the assessment were lawful and supported by tangible material. The court rejected the petitioner&#039;s argument that the reassessment was a mere change of opinion, emphasizing the importance of specific and reliable information for reassessment. As a result, all writ petitions challenging the reassessment notices were dismissed for lacking merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 16:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1806 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285361</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the reassessment notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, finding that the reasons recorded for reopening the assessment were lawful and supported by tangible material. The court rejected the petitioner&#039;s argument that the reassessment was a mere change of opinion, emphasizing the importance of specific and reliable information for reassessment. As a result, all writ petitions challenging the reassessment notices were dismissed for lacking merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>