<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (9) TMI 55 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20970</link>
    <description>The court held that non-compliance with section 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 does not invalidate the assessment order for the assessment year 1969-70. The court emphasized that section 144B outlines a procedural safeguard to prevent arbitrary assessments, and failure to comply does not affect the jurisdiction of the assessing authority. The decision to set aside the assessment order and direct a fresh assessment due to non-compliance with section 144B was upheld, highlighting the distinction between procedural irregularities and jurisdictional lapses. The judgment favored the Revenue and clarified that procedural irregularities are curable, affirming the validity of the assessment order despite non-compliance with section 144B.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:18:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59969" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (9) TMI 55 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20970</link>
      <description>The court held that non-compliance with section 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 does not invalidate the assessment order for the assessment year 1969-70. The court emphasized that section 144B outlines a procedural safeguard to prevent arbitrary assessments, and failure to comply does not affect the jurisdiction of the assessing authority. The decision to set aside the assessment order and direct a fresh assessment due to non-compliance with section 144B was upheld, highlighting the distinction between procedural irregularities and jurisdictional lapses. The judgment favored the Revenue and clarified that procedural irregularities are curable, affirming the validity of the assessment order despite non-compliance with section 144B.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>