<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 247 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390634</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings due to the mechanical approval by the PCIT without proper application of mind. Consequently, the appeal challenging the validity of the reassessment was allowed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was successful. The issues regarding disallowance of cost of improvement and business loss were not adjudicated as they became academic. The appeal was allowed on 17/12/2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 09:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 247 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390634</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings due to the mechanical approval by the PCIT without proper application of mind. Consequently, the appeal challenging the validity of the reassessment was allowed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was successful. The issues regarding disallowance of cost of improvement and business loss were not adjudicated as they became academic. The appeal was allowed on 17/12/2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>