<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 246 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390633</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, ruling that the penalty of Rs. 1,03,86,055 on the surrendered income of Rs. 3 crores was unsustainable due to lack of concealment or inaccurate particulars in the return. The penalty related to the addition of Rs. 10,565 for short rental income was upheld, as it constituted clear concealment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 246 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390633</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, ruling that the penalty of Rs. 1,03,86,055 on the surrendered income of Rs. 3 crores was unsustainable due to lack of concealment or inaccurate particulars in the return. The penalty related to the addition of Rs. 10,565 for short rental income was upheld, as it constituted clear concealment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390633</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>