https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390616 The civil court's jurisdiction was held barred where the challenge concerned measures taken by a secured creditor under the SARFAESI framework and an effective remedy was available before the Debts Recovery Tribunal under Section 17. The pleaded fraud exception was not attracted because the alleged fraud depended on seriously disputed facts, including whether a disputed authorisation for disbursal to third parties had been executed. In these circumstances, the dispute fell within the statutory forum, and the plaint was rejected. en-us Mon, 19 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Jan 2020 07:15:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390616 The civil court's jurisdiction was held barred where the challenge concerned measures taken by a secured creditor under the SARFAESI framework and an effective remedy was available before the Debts Recovery Tribunal under Section 17. The pleaded fraud exception was not attracted because the alleged fraud depended on seriously disputed facts, including whether a disputed authorisation for disbursal to third parties had been executed. In these circumstances, the dispute fell within the statutory forum, and the plaint was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 19 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390616