<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1733 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285320</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, holding that the transactions were business activities, and the lands did not qualify as agricultural lands for tax exemption purposes. Consequently, the income from the sale was deemed taxable as business income, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2020 07:09:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1733 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285320</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, holding that the transactions were business activities, and the lands did not qualify as agricultural lands for tax exemption purposes. Consequently, the income from the sale was deemed taxable as business income, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>