<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1554 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285324</link>
    <description>CBDT Circular No. 21 of 2015 prescribed monetary limits for filing income-tax appeals and stated that the instruction would apply retrospectively to pending appeals before High Courts and Tribunals. Where the tax effect was only Rs. 9.17 lakhs, below the prescribed High Court threshold, the Revenue did not press the appeal. The Bombay HC accordingly dismissed the appeal as not pressed and directed refund of court fees as per rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2020 07:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1554 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285324</link>
      <description>CBDT Circular No. 21 of 2015 prescribed monetary limits for filing income-tax appeals and stated that the instruction would apply retrospectively to pending appeals before High Courts and Tribunals. Where the tax effect was only Rs. 9.17 lakhs, below the prescribed High Court threshold, the Revenue did not press the appeal. The Bombay HC accordingly dismissed the appeal as not pressed and directed refund of court fees as per rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>