<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 734 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285314</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the penalty imposed for claiming depreciation on land at 10% under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court held that depreciation on land cannot be claimed as per established principles and found that the appellant failed to discharge the onus under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Consequently, the Court declined to interfere with the decision and upheld the penalty, ultimately dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 15:56:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 734 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285314</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the penalty imposed for claiming depreciation on land at 10% under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court held that depreciation on land cannot be claimed as per established principles and found that the appellant failed to discharge the onus under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Consequently, the Court declined to interfere with the decision and upheld the penalty, ultimately dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>