<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 1104 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285313</link>
    <description>The court upheld the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to the addition made on account of alleged bogus gifts received by the assessee. The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, finding no substantial question of law and affirming that the gifts were not genuine, and the assessee failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the unexplained money introduced as gifts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 15:53:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 1104 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285313</link>
      <description>The court upheld the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to the addition made on account of alleged bogus gifts received by the assessee. The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, finding no substantial question of law and affirming that the gifts were not genuine, and the assessee failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the unexplained money introduced as gifts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>