<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (12) TMI 24 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20958</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming the validity of the claimed partial partition for the assessment years 1973-74 and 1974-75. The court emphasized that a valid partial partition under the Income-tax Act does not require physical division of property and can involve retaining some assets as joint family property while dividing others among family members. The judgment highlighted the authority of the karta to effect a partition and stressed that the Revenue must adhere to statutory definitions without questioning the fairness of the partition unless the transaction&#039;s genuineness is in doubt.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:44:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (12) TMI 24 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20958</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming the validity of the claimed partial partition for the assessment years 1973-74 and 1974-75. The court emphasized that a valid partial partition under the Income-tax Act does not require physical division of property and can involve retaining some assets as joint family property while dividing others among family members. The judgment highlighted the authority of the karta to effect a partition and stressed that the Revenue must adhere to statutory definitions without questioning the fairness of the partition unless the transaction&#039;s genuineness is in doubt.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>