<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 1219 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285308</link>
    <description>The appeal was admitted on questions (b) and (e) concerning the deletion of disallowances for temple and community welfare expenses claimed by the assessee company. Questions (a), (c), and (d) were not entertained as they did not arise from the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order or were previously accepted or allowed without challenge. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions on the admitted questions were subject to further review in the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 14:04:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 1219 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285308</link>
      <description>The appeal was admitted on questions (b) and (e) concerning the deletion of disallowances for temple and community welfare expenses claimed by the assessee company. Questions (a), (c), and (d) were not entertained as they did not arise from the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order or were previously accepted or allowed without challenge. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions on the admitted questions were subject to further review in the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285308</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>