<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 1192 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285305</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the AO to reconsider MAT credit before calculating interest under s. 234B, citing decisions from the Madras and Bombay High Courts. It held the amendment to s. 234B as retrospective, clarifying that MAT credit should be factored in for interest calculation. The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the tax appeal and confirming the correct interpretation and application of the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 12:20:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 1192 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285305</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the AO to reconsider MAT credit before calculating interest under s. 234B, citing decisions from the Madras and Bombay High Courts. It held the amendment to s. 234B as retrospective, clarifying that MAT credit should be factored in for interest calculation. The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the tax appeal and confirming the correct interpretation and application of the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>