<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 205 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390592</link>
    <description>The appeal was rejected, upholding the impugned order based on the strict interpretation of exemption notifications and the limitation period for filing refund claims as established by various judicial fora and the Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 07:08:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 205 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390592</link>
      <description>The appeal was rejected, upholding the impugned order based on the strict interpretation of exemption notifications and the limitation period for filing refund claims as established by various judicial fora and the Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>