<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 204 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390591</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 114A of the Customs Act on the customs broker, clarifying that this section applies to the importer. The appellant had already paid the penalty under Section 114AA for misdeclaration in bills of entry. The liability to pay customs duty rests with the importer, and as the appellant did not claim to be the importer, they were not liable under Section 114A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2020 15:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 204 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390591</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 114A of the Customs Act on the customs broker, clarifying that this section applies to the importer. The appellant had already paid the penalty under Section 114AA for misdeclaration in bills of entry. The liability to pay customs duty rests with the importer, and as the appellant did not claim to be the importer, they were not liable under Section 114A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>