<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 1259 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285297</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the decisions of the CIT(A) and the Assessing Officer, ruling that the penalty of Rs. 24,54,090 under Section 271(1)(c) was unjustified. The Tribunal held that the assessee had filed the return within the extended due date under Section 139(4), thus canceling the penalty. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty was set aside in a judgment delivered on 8th April 2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 06:57:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599519" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 1259 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285297</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the decisions of the CIT(A) and the Assessing Officer, ruling that the penalty of Rs. 24,54,090 under Section 271(1)(c) was unjustified. The Tribunal held that the assessee had filed the return within the extended due date under Section 139(4), thus canceling the penalty. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty was set aside in a judgment delivered on 8th April 2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>