<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1732 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285302</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Assessing Officer was directed to rework the arm&#039;s length price following the Tribunal&#039;s observations and include/exclude specified comparables accordingly. Issues regarding the levy of interest and initiation of penalty proceedings were dismissed as either consequential or premature.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 06:57:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1732 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285302</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Assessing Officer was directed to rework the arm&#039;s length price following the Tribunal&#039;s observations and include/exclude specified comparables accordingly. Issues regarding the levy of interest and initiation of penalty proceedings were dismissed as either consequential or premature.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>