<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (1) TMI 43 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20951</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the assessee did not have the option to carry forward business loss for set off against future profits. The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that the language of the Income-tax Act did not grant the assessee the discretion to choose how to set off losses against income from other heads, except for income under the head &quot;Capital gains.&quot;</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:28:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (1) TMI 43 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20951</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the assessee did not have the option to carry forward business loss for set off against future profits. The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that the language of the Income-tax Act did not grant the assessee the discretion to choose how to set off losses against income from other heads, except for income under the head &quot;Capital gains.&quot;</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>