<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 189 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390576</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned order that demanded Central Excise duty in cash and denied Cenvat credit utilization under Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal followed the Bombay HC&#039;s decision, deeming the demand unsustainable, and provided consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 12:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 189 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390576</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned order that demanded Central Excise duty in cash and denied Cenvat credit utilization under Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal followed the Bombay HC&#039;s decision, deeming the demand unsustainable, and provided consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390576</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>