<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1950 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285287</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the transfer pricing adjustment for Assessment Year 2011-2012. It rejected the comparables selected by the revenue, including Ladderup, and directed the inclusion of comparables proposed by the assessee, ICRA Management Consulting Ltd. and IDC Ltd., due to functional similarity. The Tribunal remanded the matter for income re-computation based on the revised comparables, ultimately leading to a favorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2020 20:14:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1950 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285287</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the transfer pricing adjustment for Assessment Year 2011-2012. It rejected the comparables selected by the revenue, including Ladderup, and directed the inclusion of comparables proposed by the assessee, ICRA Management Consulting Ltd. and IDC Ltd., due to functional similarity. The Tribunal remanded the matter for income re-computation based on the revised comparables, ultimately leading to a favorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>