<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1931 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285292</link>
    <description>The court quashed the orders rejecting the petitioner&#039;s application for excise duty exemption, citing flaws in reasoning and lack of procedural fairness. The matter was remitted for reconsideration, emphasizing independent assessment and adherence to natural justice principles. Respondents were restrained from demanding excise duty until a new decision is made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2020 20:14:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1931 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285292</link>
      <description>The court quashed the orders rejecting the petitioner&#039;s application for excise duty exemption, citing flaws in reasoning and lack of procedural fairness. The matter was remitted for reconsideration, emphasizing independent assessment and adherence to natural justice principles. Respondents were restrained from demanding excise duty until a new decision is made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>