<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1556 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285279</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the Tribunal to re-compute the appellant&#039;s deduction under Sections 80HHC and 80IB of the Act on the gross total income without reducing it by the deduction available under Section 80IB. It was held that the provisions of Section 80IB(13) and Section 80IA(9) do not apply to Section 80HHC. The denial of deduction for Doctor&#039;s Sponsorship Expenses was not pressed due to minimal tax impact. The appeal was disposed of with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2020 16:55:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1556 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285279</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the Tribunal to re-compute the appellant&#039;s deduction under Sections 80HHC and 80IB of the Act on the gross total income without reducing it by the deduction available under Section 80IB. It was held that the provisions of Section 80IB(13) and Section 80IA(9) do not apply to Section 80HHC. The denial of deduction for Doctor&#039;s Sponsorship Expenses was not pressed due to minimal tax impact. The appeal was disposed of with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>