<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (1) TMI 30 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20944</link>
    <description>The existing record was held insufficient to answer the reference because the statement of case omitted the full text of the lease deed, related agreements and the resolution relied on in the Tribunal&#039;s order. As the referred questions could not be satisfactorily decided on the incomplete materials, the Tribunal was directed under section 258 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 to forward a supplementary statement of the case setting out those four documents in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:11:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (1) TMI 30 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20944</link>
      <description>The existing record was held insufficient to answer the reference because the statement of case omitted the full text of the lease deed, related agreements and the resolution relied on in the Tribunal&#039;s order. As the referred questions could not be satisfactorily decided on the incomplete materials, the Tribunal was directed under section 258 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 to forward a supplementary statement of the case setting out those four documents in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>