<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 161 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390548</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by deleting the addition of Rs. 3.25 crores as unexplained cash credits under Section 68. However, the tribunal upheld the disallowance of the depreciation claim, emphasizing the importance of proving transaction genuineness and correct application of Section 68, in line with established judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2020 06:44:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 161 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390548</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by deleting the addition of Rs. 3.25 crores as unexplained cash credits under Section 68. However, the tribunal upheld the disallowance of the depreciation claim, emphasizing the importance of proving transaction genuineness and correct application of Section 68, in line with established judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>