<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 160 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390547</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the penalty order under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was invalid due to the vagueness and lack of specificity in the show cause notice under Section 274. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of clearly specifying the charge in the notice to ensure compliance with the principles of natural justice and judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 16:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 160 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390547</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the penalty order under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was invalid due to the vagueness and lack of specificity in the show cause notice under Section 274. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of clearly specifying the charge in the notice to ensure compliance with the principles of natural justice and judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390547</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>