<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 153 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390540</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeals. It confirmed that the trust did not violate Sections 13(1)(c) and 13(2)(g), and was entitled to exemptions under Sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal also upheld that anonymous donations received by the religious trust were exempt under Section 115BBC(2), dismissing the AO&#039;s additions under Section 69. The cross objections filed by the assessee were dismissed due to a delay without a condonation petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jan 2020 22:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 153 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390540</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeals. It confirmed that the trust did not violate Sections 13(1)(c) and 13(2)(g), and was entitled to exemptions under Sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal also upheld that anonymous donations received by the religious trust were exempt under Section 115BBC(2), dismissing the AO&#039;s additions under Section 69. The cross objections filed by the assessee were dismissed due to a delay without a condonation petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>