https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390539 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appellant's appeal against the rejection of CENVAT credit. It held that denial based on technicalities, such as incorrect recipient addresses on BOEs or reliance on attested copies, was unsustainable. The Tribunal emphasized that the receipt and utilization of input services were undisputed, aligning with established legal precedents. en-us Thu, 12 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Nov 2024 12:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390539 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appellant's appeal against the rejection of CENVAT credit. It held that denial based on technicalities, such as incorrect recipient addresses on BOEs or reliance on attested copies, was unsustainable. The Tribunal emphasized that the receipt and utilization of input services were undisputed, aligning with established legal precedents. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 12 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390539