<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 146 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390533</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal and disposing of the Miscellaneous Application. The decision was based on the established precedent regarding redemption fine and penalty, emphasizing the importance of consistency in determining appropriate penalties for import violations. The reduction in fine and penalty made by the First Appellate Authority was upheld, with the Tribunal finding no reason to interfere with this decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2020 06:36:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 146 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390533</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal and disposing of the Miscellaneous Application. The decision was based on the established precedent regarding redemption fine and penalty, emphasizing the importance of consistency in determining appropriate penalties for import violations. The reduction in fine and penalty made by the First Appellate Authority was upheld, with the Tribunal finding no reason to interfere with this decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>