<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 143 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390530</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Hon&#039;ble High Court of Gujarat declaring Rule 8(3A) as ultra vires, setting aside the demand and interest, and reducing the penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 27 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2020 06:36:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 143 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390530</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Hon&#039;ble High Court of Gujarat declaring Rule 8(3A) as ultra vires, setting aside the demand and interest, and reducing the penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 27 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>