<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 142 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390529</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and providing consequential benefits to the appellant. The decision was based on the analysis of various issues including the taxability of procurement of goods or services under Business Auxiliary Services, applicability of Service Tax on price differentials, contradiction in the Show Cause Notice, limitation period for issuance of notice, interpretation of property transfer transactions, exclusivity of Sales Tax and Service Tax, and applicability of exemption under Sales Tax Act. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was in line with precedent and supported by documentary evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2020 06:36:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 142 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390529</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and providing consequential benefits to the appellant. The decision was based on the analysis of various issues including the taxability of procurement of goods or services under Business Auxiliary Services, applicability of Service Tax on price differentials, contradiction in the Show Cause Notice, limitation period for issuance of notice, interpretation of property transfer transactions, exclusivity of Sales Tax and Service Tax, and applicability of exemption under Sales Tax Act. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was in line with precedent and supported by documentary evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>