<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 134 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390521</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) to reconsider a petitioner&#039;s application for Notification under Section 10(46) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, retrospectively from 01.06.2011. The Court emphasized the similarity in income nature over the years and instructed the CBDT to make a prompt decision within eight weeks from receiving the order&#039;s certified copy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jan 2020 12:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 134 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390521</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) to reconsider a petitioner&#039;s application for Notification under Section 10(46) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, retrospectively from 01.06.2011. The Court emphasized the similarity in income nature over the years and instructed the CBDT to make a prompt decision within eight weeks from receiving the order&#039;s certified copy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>