<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (10) TMI 51 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20933</link>
    <description>The High Court held that in cases of a firm&#039;s constitution change during an accounting year, the original firm&#039;s income must be assessed separately from the reconstituted firm&#039;s income. It was deemed impermissible to aggregate the incomes of both firms for assessment purposes. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the necessity for distinct assessments for the two periods, aligning with the Supreme Court&#039;s stance on the issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:36:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (10) TMI 51 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20933</link>
      <description>The High Court held that in cases of a firm&#039;s constitution change during an accounting year, the original firm&#039;s income must be assessed separately from the reconstituted firm&#039;s income. It was deemed impermissible to aggregate the incomes of both firms for assessment purposes. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the necessity for distinct assessments for the two periods, aligning with the Supreme Court&#039;s stance on the issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>