<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 100 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390487</link>
    <description>Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 applies only when an assessee manufactures both dutiable final products and exempted goods. Where spent sulphuric acid emerges compulsorily as a by-product or waste in the manufacture of detergent products, it is not a separate manufactured final product for Rule 6 purposes. The amendment to the definition of excisable goods did not dispense with the threshold requirement that the process amount to manufacture under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Rule 6 was therefore inapplicable, and the demand for reversal of CENVAT credit and consequential duty could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jan 2020 10:46:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 100 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390487</link>
      <description>Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 applies only when an assessee manufactures both dutiable final products and exempted goods. Where spent sulphuric acid emerges compulsorily as a by-product or waste in the manufacture of detergent products, it is not a separate manufactured final product for Rule 6 purposes. The amendment to the definition of excisable goods did not dispense with the threshold requirement that the process amount to manufacture under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Rule 6 was therefore inapplicable, and the demand for reversal of CENVAT credit and consequential duty could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>