<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Sets Aside Demand: No Evidence Found to Support Claim that Lead Purity Increase Constitutes Manufacturing Process.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51037</link>
    <description>Process amounting to manufacture or not - appellant purchases lead ingots (purity of 99.5% or grade ‘B’) and thereafter remove the same either without processing as such or after increasing the purity to 99.9% - the impugned order suffers from mistake of law and fact. Further, there is no test report on record in support of allegation of revenue - Demand set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 05 Jan 2020 10:42:43 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jan 2020 10:42:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Sets Aside Demand: No Evidence Found to Support Claim that Lead Purity Increase Constitutes Manufacturing Process.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51037</link>
      <description>Process amounting to manufacture or not - appellant purchases lead ingots (purity of 99.5% or grade ‘B’) and thereafter remove the same either without processing as such or after increasing the purity to 99.9% - the impugned order suffers from mistake of law and fact. Further, there is no test report on record in support of allegation of revenue - Demand set aside.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Jan 2020 10:42:43 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>