<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 97 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390484</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the original authority to decide on the entitlement to interest on the refund amount under section 11BB of the Central Excise Act and to determine the appropriateness of the adjustment made under the CGST Act. The Tribunal clarified its lack of jurisdiction over decisions under the CGST Act and emphasized that matters related to the CGST Act should be addressed by the competent authority under the CGST Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 13:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 97 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390484</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the original authority to decide on the entitlement to interest on the refund amount under section 11BB of the Central Excise Act and to determine the appropriateness of the adjustment made under the CGST Act. The Tribunal clarified its lack of jurisdiction over decisions under the CGST Act and emphasized that matters related to the CGST Act should be addressed by the competent authority under the CGST Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>