<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1860 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT  </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285263</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the reassessment proceedings were invalid as they constituted a mere change of opinion. The court also affirmed the disallowance of the additional depreciation claim under section 32(1)(iia). Consequently, the appeals challenging the reassessment proceedings and the disallowance of additional depreciation were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jan 2020 09:59:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1860 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT  </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285263</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the reassessment proceedings were invalid as they constituted a mere change of opinion. The court also affirmed the disallowance of the additional depreciation claim under section 32(1)(iia). Consequently, the appeals challenging the reassessment proceedings and the disallowance of additional depreciation were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>