<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1755 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285261</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the earlier decision and ruling in favor of the appellant based on the correct method of valuation established through legal interpretation and precedent. The Tribunal upheld the valuation based on transaction value for goods sold to independent buyers, emphasizing the importance of correctly interpreting and applying valuation rules in excise duty matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2020 13:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1755 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285261</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the earlier decision and ruling in favor of the appellant based on the correct method of valuation established through legal interpretation and precedent. The Tribunal upheld the valuation based on transaction value for goods sold to independent buyers, emphasizing the importance of correctly interpreting and applying valuation rules in excise duty matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>