https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285241 Article 174(1) governs the sittings of an existing Legislative Assembly and does not apply to a House that has been dissolved; it therefore does not prescribe any outer time limit for fresh elections after premature dissolution. Election scheduling under Article 324 lies within the Election Commission's constitutional domain and operates separately from Article 174(1), so recourse to Article 356 is unnecessary on this construction. Neither the Constitution nor the Representation of the People Act, 1951 creates an express limitation period for holding such elections, although the constitutional scheme requires prompt action and elections should ordinarily be held within six months of dissolution. en-us Mon, 28 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Apr 2023 12:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285241 Article 174(1) governs the sittings of an existing Legislative Assembly and does not apply to a House that has been dissolved; it therefore does not prescribe any outer time limit for fresh elections after premature dissolution. Election scheduling under Article 324 lies within the Election Commission's constitutional domain and operates separately from Article 174(1), so recourse to Article 356 is unnecessary on this construction. Neither the Constitution nor the Representation of the People Act, 1951 creates an express limitation period for holding such elections, although the constitutional scheme requires prompt action and elections should ordinarily be held within six months of dissolution. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 28 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285241