<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 90 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390477</link>
    <description>The HC granted the petitioner&#039;s Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to refund Rs. 4,80,355 in IGST for exported goods. The court determined that the circular cited by the respondents could not override statutory provisions that allow IGST refunds for exports made post-tax payment. The petitioner&#039;s claim was upheld, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2025 13:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 90 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390477</link>
      <description>The HC granted the petitioner&#039;s Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to refund Rs. 4,80,355 in IGST for exported goods. The court determined that the circular cited by the respondents could not override statutory provisions that allow IGST refunds for exports made post-tax payment. The petitioner&#039;s claim was upheld, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>