<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 88 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390475</link>
    <description>The Tribunal focused on the invalid and mechanical approval under Section 151 for reopening the case under Section 147/148. It found the approval lacked proper application of mind, rendering the reassessment proceedings invalid. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings and allowed the appeal on this ground. Other grounds raised by the assessee were dismissed as they were not argued substantively. The appeal was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2020 13:07:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 88 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390475</link>
      <description>The Tribunal focused on the invalid and mechanical approval under Section 151 for reopening the case under Section 147/148. It found the approval lacked proper application of mind, rendering the reassessment proceedings invalid. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings and allowed the appeal on this ground. Other grounds raised by the assessee were dismissed as they were not argued substantively. The appeal was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>