<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 79 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390466</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, dismissing the appeal due to the assessee&#039;s non-appearance and confirming additions of income under section 69, disallowance of expenses under section 40(a)(ia), and deferred market expenses as business expenses. The CIT(A) directed quantification of PF and ESIC contributions and addressed the levy of interest under section 234C. The judgment was pronounced on 4th December 2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2020 12:55:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 79 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390466</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, dismissing the appeal due to the assessee&#039;s non-appearance and confirming additions of income under section 69, disallowance of expenses under section 40(a)(ia), and deferred market expenses as business expenses. The CIT(A) directed quantification of PF and ESIC contributions and addressed the levy of interest under section 234C. The judgment was pronounced on 4th December 2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>