https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285233 A tenant who had entered an agreement to purchase the demised premises could not resist ejectment on the basis of part performance or the equitable effect of notice to a subsequent purchaser. Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act required pleading and proof of readiness and willingness, plus possession referable to part performance, and those facts were not established. The occupant's possession remained that of a tenant, not as owner under the contract. Section 91 of the Indian Trusts Act could operate only after specific enforcement of the contract and conveyance; until then, it did not bar eviction by the landlord. en-us Sat, 24 Dec 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Jan 2020 10:54:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285233 A tenant who had entered an agreement to purchase the demised premises could not resist ejectment on the basis of part performance or the equitable effect of notice to a subsequent purchaser. Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act required pleading and proof of readiness and willingness, plus possession referable to part performance, and those facts were not established. The occupant's possession remained that of a tenant, not as owner under the contract. Section 91 of the Indian Trusts Act could operate only after specific enforcement of the contract and conveyance; until then, it did not bar eviction by the landlord. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 24 Dec 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285233