<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 75 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390462</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and deleted the late filing fees imposed under Sec.234E, based on the legal position that such fees for periods before 01.06.2015 were not valid. The ITAT also condoned the delay in filing the appeal, considering the valid reasons presented by the assessee for the delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2020 10:40:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 75 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390462</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and deleted the late filing fees imposed under Sec.234E, based on the legal position that such fees for periods before 01.06.2015 were not valid. The ITAT also condoned the delay in filing the appeal, considering the valid reasons presented by the assessee for the delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>