<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 73 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390460</link>
    <description>Under the substituted Rule 5 refund framework for accumulated Cenvat credit, exporters are entitled to a simplified refund mechanism and the Revenue cannot reopen the availment of credit at the refund stage by insisting on a fresh nexus test between input services and exports. Where no objection was raised when the credit was taken, refund cannot be denied later on the ground that the services were intermediary services or that the required correlation was absent. The amended refund scheme and relevant notification support the export character of the services and the sanction of refund, so the rejection of refund was set aside and the refund restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2020 15:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 73 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390460</link>
      <description>Under the substituted Rule 5 refund framework for accumulated Cenvat credit, exporters are entitled to a simplified refund mechanism and the Revenue cannot reopen the availment of credit at the refund stage by insisting on a fresh nexus test between input services and exports. Where no objection was raised when the credit was taken, refund cannot be denied later on the ground that the services were intermediary services or that the required correlation was absent. The amended refund scheme and relevant notification support the export character of the services and the sanction of refund, so the rejection of refund was set aside and the refund restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>