<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 71 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390458</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals with modifications to penalties imposed in a smuggling case involving gold bars. While penalties for two main individuals were upheld, penalties for others were set aside due to insufficient evidence distinguishing their roles. The decision emphasized the importance of clearly establishing individual involvement in smuggling activities, ensuring justice based on evidence and legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 71 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390458</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals with modifications to penalties imposed in a smuggling case involving gold bars. While penalties for two main individuals were upheld, penalties for others were set aside due to insufficient evidence distinguishing their roles. The decision emphasized the importance of clearly establishing individual involvement in smuggling activities, ensuring justice based on evidence and legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>