<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (3) TMI 6 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20920</link>
    <description>The High Court of CALCUTTA upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee&#039;s entitlement to deduction under section 16(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the pension received. The judgment emphasized the inclusive definition of &quot;salary&quot; under section 17 to encompass pension for the purpose of deductions under section 16(i), highlighting the legislative intent behind allowing deductions based on a formula rather than actual expenditure incurred by the assessee. The court dismissed arguments regarding the employer-employee relationship, affirming that the pension received was part of the terms of employment and the entitlement of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:04:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (3) TMI 6 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20920</link>
      <description>The High Court of CALCUTTA upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee&#039;s entitlement to deduction under section 16(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the pension received. The judgment emphasized the inclusive definition of &quot;salary&quot; under section 17 to encompass pension for the purpose of deductions under section 16(i), highlighting the legislative intent behind allowing deductions based on a formula rather than actual expenditure incurred by the assessee. The court dismissed arguments regarding the employer-employee relationship, affirming that the pension received was part of the terms of employment and the entitlement of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>