<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 60 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390447</link>
    <description>Bail conditions in a CGST prosecution were examined where the accused challenged a surety requirement of Rs. 2 crores each as excessive. The HC noted that, even in cases involving substantial alleged tax evasion, an extraordinarily onerous surety condition may amount to a virtual refusal of bail and frustrate the purpose of the bail order. On that basis, the court found the condition excessive and reduced the surety requirement to Rs. 50 lakhs each.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2025 13:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 60 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390447</link>
      <description>Bail conditions in a CGST prosecution were examined where the accused challenged a surety requirement of Rs. 2 crores each as excessive. The HC noted that, even in cases involving substantial alleged tax evasion, an extraordinarily onerous surety condition may amount to a virtual refusal of bail and frustrate the purpose of the bail order. On that basis, the court found the condition excessive and reduced the surety requirement to Rs. 50 lakhs each.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>