https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390444 The High Court held that the reassessment was without jurisdiction as reasons for reopening were not provided to the Assessee. The Court emphasized that failure to supply reasons despite requests renders the reassessment invalid. The appeal was dismissed as it did not raise any substantial legal question based on established principles and facts. en-us Thu, 19 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Jan 2020 17:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390444 The High Court held that the reassessment was without jurisdiction as reasons for reopening were not provided to the Assessee. The Court emphasized that failure to supply reasons despite requests renders the reassessment invalid. The appeal was dismissed as it did not raise any substantial legal question based on established principles and facts. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 19 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390444