<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 47 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390434</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the revenue and the cross objections filed by the assessee, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the assessment made under Section 143(3) was invalid due to the lack of a valid notice under Section 143(2). The Tribunal reiterated the necessity of issuing a notice under Section 143(2) for a valid assessment, as mandated by the Supreme Court in the case of Hotel Blue Moon.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2020 17:41:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 47 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390434</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the revenue and the cross objections filed by the assessee, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the assessment made under Section 143(3) was invalid due to the lack of a valid notice under Section 143(2). The Tribunal reiterated the necessity of issuing a notice under Section 143(2) for a valid assessment, as mandated by the Supreme Court in the case of Hotel Blue Moon.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>