<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 46 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390433</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remitting the matter back to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision on the merits. The assessee had filed the return of income and paid the taxes due, falling under section 249(4)(a) rather than (b). The Tribunal emphasized the importance of fulfilling statutory conditions for appeal admissibility and directed the CIT(A) to reconsider the issue on merits after providing a fair hearing to the assessee and ensuring compliance with notices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2020 17:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 46 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390433</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remitting the matter back to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision on the merits. The assessee had filed the return of income and paid the taxes due, falling under section 249(4)(a) rather than (b). The Tribunal emphasized the importance of fulfilling statutory conditions for appeal admissibility and directed the CIT(A) to reconsider the issue on merits after providing a fair hearing to the assessee and ensuring compliance with notices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>